Technology offers us the opportunity to be in two places at once. I apologize to do this but I was in two places at once this past week. I am holding a picture of myself bundled up sledding with my family while standing in a bathing suit on the beautiful beaches of Aruba!! #walkmyworld #aruba
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Friday, February 13, 2015
Panel Discussion Topic #4
Pick one panel discussion you find
interesting and discuss how it connects to the Task Force recommendations.
The panel discussion I choose to look at was improving international support
for education. The reason I picked this panel discussion is because I feel it
closely related to many of the task force recommendations discussed. At the beginning of the discussion, the Global Monitoring Report was addressed. Mr. Antoninis stated, "A lot of people have focused
more on some of the projections we have made for some of the poorest and most
vulnerable children who perhaps would not be able to reach the education for our goals
well into the century, in the case of lower second education even well into the next
century." I believe this statement to be true yet scary. No matter how often we try and predict the outcome, it is always just that, a prediction. Teaching is like the weather, very unpredictable. Now, school systems are trying to be on the "same playing field" as other schools. But each playing field and its given conditions are different depending on where they are located. What do we lose when we require everyone to test the same and learn the same information? Do we lose anything? I believe we lose the essence of how students learn. As Heidi Hayes Jacobs stated in our discussion, "the question should be what is the experience we want our students to have." Below are four task force
recommendations and how I feel the discussion connected to them:
Recommendation 1: A Global Paradigm Shift
The task force recommendation discusses the shift from globally
opening the door to access plus learning. The discussion panel addressed this recommendation numerous times. In one statement the panel discussed, "of course, as we know, that is the lion’s share and it
will grow, and I think for an organization like Save the Children our view is increasingly
our role is going to be targeting our advocacy at the country level to empower our
partners to advocate to their own governments for the better spending of their taxpayer’s
money on education and other basic services". The word empower stuck out at me. How can we empower our teachers and also our students. The global paradigm shift suggests just that. Learning on a deeper level is an idea many teachers are pushed to pursue. Yesterday, my school had a faculty meeting regarding the "flipped classroom." The man who invented the flipped classroom spoke. In his closing statements he said, "if any teacher can be replaced by YouTube, they should be." At first I was taken back by that statement. But looking at the statement more clearly, I realized his meaning behind what he said. The speaker challenged us as teachers to be irreplaceable. Everything we teach is on YouTube. Knowing and understanding is a basic concept students can do at home. It is the applying, creating and empowering students that makes us as teachers irreplaceable.
Recommendation 2: Learning Competencies
The task force recommendation, learning competencies, talk about the
various levels of learning and the connections made based on a variety of set standards. This task force connects with the panel through various discussions. The panel stated, "I do think that we need to help our countries work on the
efficiency piece in addition to how much money’s being deployed". As stated in a previous response, my school has been given devices for both the teachers and students as well as an updated technology system. Does this help our students be on the same playing field as some other affluent schools? What does learning competencies look like then at our school? I believe learning competencies are different depending on the schools make up. The only way schools can be on the same learning competency from district to district is start with the demographics and address the necessary need of learning. For example, it is my experience in my school, that the main goal is connecting with the students. Once there is a trust, learning can be endless. If the trust is not there, the students will be resilient to learning from the teacher.
Recommendation 5: Equity
This recommendations discusses the
equity between our students and the globally connected world as well as
connecting our students to the world on an equal level. The panel stated, "So, I think we’re at a tipping point now, and the replenishment would be
fantastic if we came out of that replenishment with real mutual accountability on both
sides of the table, this is the money we’re committing, this is how we’re going to report on
it, and this is how we’re going to make sure it reaches the poorest and the most
marginalized children in this country." I believe many schools do have funds to provide students with adequate education. I also believe not all schools provide those resources equally and nessecary to the programs in need. For example, my schools has made many budget cuts. Programs that once flourished are now gone; however, each teacher has a smart board and each student has a Samsung Galaxy. Does this provide our students with an equal opportunity as other schools? I am not sure I have that answer. Every school is different and therefore needs to be looked for their needs and not what every other school is getting. By losing teachers and classes the students miss out on smaller classes as well they now have a less variety to choose from. At the beginning of the school year a speaker stood in front of our staff and discussed discipline in our schools. Once statement stuck with me. The speaker said, "treat every child fair but do not treat them equal." Powerful statement that to this day, still makes me think.
Recommendation 7: Taking Action
The last recommendation I would like to discuss is task force seven, taking action. In my opinion, this task force recommendation is the most
important. The recommendation discusses applying all the recommendations
to become a globally competent school. The panel addresses all of the task force but the most important one they discuss is applying the information in schools. Discussing the issue is one thing, acting on it is another. The panel says, "a lot of time and effort wasted in reporting. When
governments have to do a multiple of reports to all of their donors every year, they’re
taking effort away from what they ought to be doing sort of as their day job, which is
promoting better education". Many times schools focus on implementing initiative after initiative. Before we know it we have many different initiatives, but none are applied to the full capacity. The panel touched upon some important questions we need such as, "does the child feel safe? Is
the child learning to learn? Is the teacher focusing on the child? Is the teacher punishing
the child?" Those are the driving force behind what education should be. I believe we can meet these goals and objectives as long as we continue to ask, are MY students led to learn.
Task Force Recommendations; Discussion Points #2 and #3
Choose two of the
following to discuss:
The article Toward Universal Learning, discussed many different task force recommendations. The first task force I would like to focus on is recommendation one, a global paradigm shift. This task force suggests "a shift in global focus and investment from universal access to access plus learning." This task force recommendation discusses how learning should provide students with an equality of both connection and knowledge. Not only should we provide students with the ability to access this information on a global level but also allow access with a deeper connection to the information they seek.
Looking at this recommendation, I remember an assignment I was given in elementary school. We were required to provide a
family tree. The family tree must provide examples of where you family originated from as well as pictures. Making this a starting point, I showcased pictures
of myself and what I liked to do with my family. Based on this task force recommendation, why not take it a step further? Why not
provide food from my various cultural backgrounds? A tangible item might make the project more meaningful to students. It could have the ability to connect with learners in
those parts of the world my family extends from. Now, not only can a learner
showcase who they are but they can connect on a deeper, more globally
connected meaning.
The second task for I would like to discuss is recommendations two, learning
competencies. This level discusses the seven domains of learning as seen below.
This task force recommendation, allows
our systems to provide students with the essential knowledge they will need for
their future. The
competencies are broken down into various age groups as well learning settings
and therefore can be designed to the needed of the individual
students. Looking at the spectrum of learning across the various age groups, one can then develop a lesson and curriculum around the needs of each student. The task force recommendation provides teachers with the information they need to help the students and it also provides the students with areas of need. I believe this task force has more of a connection to
the Common Core State Standards. Not only do we need to provide our students with accurate information but we are also requiring them to obtain and apply the information with modern day learning.
Discussion #1
How well do you think our schools are meeting the goals of this document? Why or why not? What needs
to happen or what are the next steps?
The
article Succeeding Globally through International
Education and Engagement discusses goals set for our students in different areas in our education system. Some of these goals are:
- A world-class education for all students
- Global competencies for all students
- International bench marking and applying lessons learned from other countries
- Education diplomacy and engagement with other countries.
The article suggests, "a
globally competent student is necessary because of economic competitiveness,
global challenges, national security and diplomacy, and a growing diverse
society."
Image CC from Succeeding Globally through International Education and Engagement
|
In order to answer the question whether or not I believe our schools are meeting the goals of this article I must first look at the objectives. The article discusses four main objectives:
1. Increase the global competencies of all U.S. students, including those from traditionally disadvantaged groups.
I believe there is a strong push to help diminish the gap in disadvantaged groups such as inner city schools and less fortunate communities. In contrast, there is a very strong part of education that seems to be lacking when one is solely focused on global competencies and marking every student on the same higher education page, connection. I work in an inner city school and therefore get to see this first hand. Within the past couple years, we have updated our systems, classrooms and devices. Every classroom has a smart board and every child has a device. Do those updates put my students on the same level as an affluent community? I do not believe so. Sure it is one thing to provide these opportunities to our students, but it is another to utilize it in a way the students can connect. Although my students now have these opportunities to "open new doors" how many actually take them? When looking at my population, there are many kids who leave school thinking about their job they hate but have to keep to pay bills for their household. Or another student who is in a violent home just waiting to go back to school so they be out of that environment. I believe the more important question is, what is global competency in those traditionally disadvantaged groups and then we can look at whether or not they are being met.
2. Enhance federal, state and local education policy and practice applying lessons learned from other countries to drive excellence and innovation in the U.S. and abroad.
I do not believe our system harnesses this objective as much as we should. Traditionally, our classrooms provide students with information they will be tested on to assess our schools progress and therefore driving our classroom discussions. My classroom had the privilege of having a student from China in our class a little over a year ago. During the school year we discussed what schools look like in China. How subjects are broken up and taught to the students and what an average school day consists of. The students in my class were astounded by the educational system. This particular student discussed how in China, students have to apply to high school much like college for our students. If you did not meet certain requirements you were placed in a workforce. Am I saying this is how our country should handle our educational system? No; however, I do believe the educational system is valued more when given higher standards. The emphasis is more on student responsibilities and expectations rather than other factors.
3. Advance U.S. international priorities in strategically important countries through active education diplomacy.
I do believe some school systems meet this objective providing students with a meaningful education through internships and other globally connected resources. So if only some schools harness this objective, how can we improve this? I believe we can bring this into our schools more if we continue to push program such as iearn and the mystic seaport exploration. There are many beneficial programs to help our student acknowledge the world that is around them. Embracing this and developing connections can only happen when there is a want from the student population. I believe this "want" will come after we teach them the basics. Opening new doors to other curriculum around the globe and various cultures may be scary for some and therefore students can be resilient. I found in my classroom, the students were questioning the boy from China more once he shared his everyday school schedule with them. Of course, you will have your students who focus on "oh my goodness you had an hour for lunch and could go wherever you wanted"! But most students valued his education because he showcased how much he valued it.
4. Develop, monitor and continuously improve ED’s international activities in an integrated and coordinated manner
At first, I did not believe our school systems demonstrated this objective to the best of our ability. Since programs such as STEM, Common Core, and the SBAC testing, many of these objectives are being met. All of these tests are done to have a blanket, "bar", or level for the children in the United States who adopted them. I do this we need to continue this work in order to improve our international activities. I also think it would be interesting to view these programs on a global level and see where our country matches up to other countries. Then we are truly see as a country where we stand.
Monday, February 9, 2015
Week 6 Reflection on the Videos
There
are many things to think about, talk about, and be worried about as we review
this week’s materials. For example, can we empower students through the right
infrastructure, the right culture, and/or the right processes? Should we start
with outcomes first, or should that now change to meet new learners and the
types of engagement/experience we want for them? How do we connect the real
world to the other real world? Should we actually be worried about big brother
and privacy as we try to engage 21st century learners in a connected
environment? Is the cloud the right way to go as we begin to embrace ubiquitous
learning? Are there ethical and legal implications of this new embrace to
connectivity?
Image CC from US magazine |
My #itdml class had three videos we were required to watch. Each of the videos discussed real-life problems I see in our school systems today. For example, in the Connected Learning: Real World Engagement video discussed how schools are asking the wrong questions. As a school system we are being defined by our test scores and therefore teachers have to cover a certain amount of curriculum. Rather than engaging the students, teachers rush to get through the material so they do not fall behind. By doing this, it seems as though we have lost sight of what school is. Creativity sharing, developing, and analyzing are all a part of the Common Core State Standards yet do we provide our students opportunities to do these things? As teachers and a school we quickly become defined by our outcomes. Nothing seems to matter but reaching certain standards and materials. The video suggests we should be asking, "What is the experience we want the student to have"? This questions therefore harness engagement. Students soon are not embarrassed by failures but rather feel comfortable enough to come back and correct it. There is a necessary need to know. Each student will then have a desire and a want to know. So how do you create a need to know question? How can you get your students excited to find out the answer and questions items they do not know so they can find the answer? These are all emotional questions. In order to be a need to know it must be an emotional connection first. The video questioned, how do you design a fracture problem to become a need to know lesson for a nine year old? The answer is by developing a meaningful connection so the nine year old wants to know the information rather than has to know. Like anything else we do in our lives, learning comes easier to things we find enjoyment out of. I think about when my eight year old is required to read a Chapter book and reflect on it. It is a struggle to get her to read sometimes; however, it is in contrast very difficult to pull her away from a gymnastic biography of Gabby Douglas. Although the Gabby Douglas book is longer with a smaller text, she still loves to read it. Her enjoyment adds to her learning. Now she understands gymnastic terms and language which seems foreign to me!
The second
video, Internships Offer Meaningful Real-World Learning is
about a student who is involved in an internship program to check water quality
in his hometown. Internships provide students with new ways to not only
meet new people but also do things they might not normally do in school.
Based on the student’s interest, the internship connects them with the
community. Students can then work in a real-life, hands on experience.
This video posed the question, what is school? In this
"school", hands on programs with real-life professionals is a must do
and not an option to read in a book. Internships provide
students with an individual learning plan. The students are usually in
the community about two days a week to learn in the real world.
After all, what are real world academics when they aren't being used
in the real world? In this case, Noah was able to not only learn
various different skills in the internship, it also provided him with a
purposeful connection in the community. I believe internships allow students to
take control of their own education. It allows students to
actively view problems that matter around the community and creativity
collaborate with professional’s ways to enhance and change it.
The
last video, RSA-Animate-Re-Imagining
Work said 71% of people are disengaged at work.
To me, that number seems really high. Why could this be? The
video suggests technology could be a problem as well as the environment we work
in. Technology allows information to become public and therefore
could cause problems. But the true question is how can we innovate
our ideas and harness creativity? A cubical provides a workplace
isolation. If they are taken away, more people will talk to each other.
But what happens with the "big brother" and the feeling of
always be "watched". People and even my students tend to
comfort themselves and design their own workplace with headphones. Ultimately,
the flexibility of the workplace is encouraged. Although scary for
most companies, flexibility and workers taking control of how they
work is suggested as a necessary element in the workplace.
Image CC by www.wikipedia.com |
Being a teacher, this is a scary scene. I fear many things when
students are able to use the tools in front of them and use them
with how they feel they need to. I believe one major problem with this is
many teachers, bosses, and "big brothers" feel without the
proper guidance and training work might not be done.
I have been trying to relinquish some of the control in my
classroom. Some of my classes do better with this then other classes.
I do see a sense of fear in my students when I tell them to be creative.
Is this because I have told them all along what they will be doing?
Or is this the typical behavior of a student in the 21st century?
Does our school allow for creative thinking or are we too focused on curriculum,
topics and deadlines? Since I have first stepped back, my students do not
flinch as much as they used to. They still are struggling with being
creative but I think it takes times. I decided to ask my students one day
what types of games they played as kids. Were they out in the backyard
developing games and if so what were the games. Most of my students said
they were never outside developing games. Instead they were working.
Working to pay bills for their family. If they weren't working they
were playing video games. This made me think of the video clip from "Grown Ups". In the video, two children were confused when their dad asked them to play outside rather than sit inside and play video games. So how can we break this cycle? Where does it
start?
Response #2
After you spend some time exploring the site, or the one below from Facing the Future, please post 2 or 3 lesson ideas from the site you'd like to try with your students or in your school.
I started to look at the Facing the Future website and found myself engulfed in the lessons they had to offer. There were many lessons I could use in my high school health education classroom. Below are a couple of those lessons as well as an explanation of how I could use them in my classroom:
I started to look at the Facing the Future website and found myself engulfed in the lessons they had to offer. There were many lessons I could use in my high school health education classroom. Below are a couple of those lessons as well as an explanation of how I could use them in my classroom:
- Apples to Apples: The lesson looks at the differences in "apples" based on where they are grow, how much water they receive, and other differences. Although they were grown in different areas of the world, the apples are seemingly identical. I would compare this lesson to my students during the discussion of discrimination, stereotypes, and prejudices. Although we may come from different places and raised in different ways are are alike and should be seen as the same because ultimately, we are all human.
- Are You Buying This? In this lesson, students create and present mock television commercials for products linked to unhealthy behaviors. The students first present the information "as seen on TV" and then produce the same commercial with the products negative impacts. This lesson can be incorporated in both my health and physical education classrooms. The students can use this lesson in nutrition showcasing different types of foods as well as exercising/diets. I believe this lesson would be an interesting comparison to what we see on TV and the true message behind the marketing.
- Bio Poem: My students already create a BIO poem during the first couple days of class. They create a poster, chimerical, website, as well as various other ideas to portray a message of "who they are". This lesson is intended to illustrate students strengths, interests, and the factors that have made them who they are today.
- The Choice is Yours: This lesson could be used in my nutrition unit for both my physical education and health education lessons. During the lesson, students look at the benefits and consequences of purchasing different foods. I would like to incorporate different countries as well. As we know, we eat different items based on where we live. It might be interesting to extend this lesson and give each student a different country and showcase what a typical "entree" would look like at the dinner table. The student's can then compare and contrast the meals from all over the world. Which foods are healthier? Why?
- Connections All Around Me: Me, My Food and My Environment: Although this lesson is ideally for K-4th graders, I believe my Freshman can benefit from it as well. In this lesson we would examine various agriculture places such as dairy farms, a produce farm, or a local garden. Based on how the foods are produced, each student develops a short story or video. Unfortunately, many of my students do not have the opportunity to have a garden or see where their food grows. I think it would be a great lesson to not only have my students witness but also take part in organizing a community garden the whole town can use. The students can act as the "teachers" and help the community understand how the food grows and where it comes from. We could also take it a step further and can go into the elementary classrooms to help mentor the students on this subject area.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)